During the lead-up to his and Councilor Bill Marra’s ward meeting on 10 November, Lewenza is reported as saying he thought,
“Mayor Eddie Francis had the leadership skills and knowledge to end the strike, but a work stoppage became politically advantageous for the mayor.”However, it has already been determined here that Edgar Francis is completely devoid of any leadership ability or principles, councilor.
Would a “leader” publically berate an employee as happened at City Hall last week? In an unbelievable display of childishness, the mayor yelled and screamed at a customer service employee while in front of members of the public. It was an amped up display that we have come to expect from the mayor during council meetings when he sarcastically chides and belittles councilors. No, I am certain this is not part of being a leader.
A leader leads others toward a common goal. A leader will learn from his or her mistakes, amend their methods, and continue to guide their followers toward the objective. Mistakes will be made but lessons should be learned. How to explain then why the mayor stepped away from his post on the Transit Windsor Board of Directors during contract negotiations, with the Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 616.
Why did Councilor Bill Marra have to take the mayor’s place on the board of directors? We may never know, but I’m sure 100’s of daily transit users are grateful that the negotiating committee was able to come to an agreement with the union without a work stoppage. With the same issues on the table as during the 101 day civic strike the negotiating teams for both sides should be congratulated for their accomplishment.
In London, there is a transit strike underway as of Monday. Windsor’s own transit employees could have been heading down the same slippery slope but for the use of alternative methods of negotiation rather than the confrontational politicizing and personalizing, as was done during the summer with CUPE locals 82 and 543. Possibly none on the transit board would play any of the mayor’s games.
Now there is the issue with the expressed apology by Windsor Chief of Police, Gary Smith, to the Islamic community in the city.
In the wake of a raid on a home in search of FBI and RCMP identified terrorist suspects ,Gary Smith thought it appropriate to issue an apology for an Emergency Services Unit officer who physically “patted” down the wife of one of the suspects.
Windsor Police Chief Gary Smith publicly apologized to the Muslim community this week after one of his officers allegedly patted down the wife of a suspect during a raid tied to a case in metro Detroit that ended in the shooting death of an Islamic leader.Many people have already commented on the operational requirements of securing a scene during a high risk raid such as occurred. I won’t get into that except to quote the president of the Windsor Police Association, Ed Parent.
“The actions taken did cause embarrassment and did offend their religious beliefs,” Smith said in a statement. “I sincerely apologize to the families and the Islamic community.”
Windsor police assisted other Canadian law enforcement in an Oct. 31 raid to apprehend Windsor residents Mohammad Al-Sahli, 33, and Yassir Ali Khan, 30. Federal authorities said they were part of a radical Muslim group based in Detroit that was led by Luqman Ameen Abdullah, killed by FBI agents in a shootout during an Oct. 28 raid in Dearborn.
"In my belief, this isn't a cultural issue," said Ed Parent, president of the Windsor Police Association and a former tactical officer. "These officers had a warrant to arrest someone. They went in, and they arrested this person.... That's it."Lost in the shuffle are other concerns, the first being the meeting of Islamic community leaders with the mayor and the Chief of Police. It may be a common occasion when individuals request to meet with only the Chair of the Police Services Board as Edgar points out.
"Usually, when you make an apology, that means something was wrong. In my opinion, nothing went wrong here," Parent said. "I believe the officers were doing everything they're entitled to do under the law. I believe they did it professionally. I don't see an issue here."
Francis said the meeting was attended by himself as chairman of the Windsor Police Services Board, Irfan Qadir -- a Muslim member of the Windsor Police Services Board -- Smith, the two deputy police chiefs, and three representatives from the Windsor Islamic Association including Peer.Sure I’ll give you that, but does the Chief usually hold a press conference, as a result of one of those meetings, on his own initiative? Especially where he would be making a highly controversial statement as is the case? Did the mayor know what the Chief was going to do or was Gary Smith acting alone? Was the apology as discussion point during the meeting? By their own admission the Islamic community representatives said they did not pressure those in attendance.
Asked who arranged the meeting, the mayor replied: "It was something that the community asked for. From time to time, it happens that different groups ask for police services to come forward. Sometimes they'd like to meet with the entire board, sometimes with just the chief and the chair, or the deputy chair.
"There was no pressure at all," said Dr. Ismail Peer, president of the association.Calm what? I thought you "follow the law"?
"We are in no position to make any pressure on anyone," added Abdelkader Tayebi, the association's secretary. "We respect the law, we follow the law."
Peer said he told the chief at the meeting that an apology "would be very appropriate to calm down some of the concerns and the ill feelings. Some people have ill feelings against the police force for what they have done."
So there was discussion during the meeting of an apology and it was brought up by Dr Peer. The mayor was aware that Smith was going to make an apology. Where were the other members of the Police Services Board? Should this have been approved by the board as a whole? Who authorized Chief Smith to formally and publically make this apology? Did the mayor overstep the bounds of the authority of the board to allow the Chief to proceed with his plan?
Police Services ActNothing in there that says the board chair (Edgar) may direct the chief, but rather the board (as a whole) may “give orders and directions”. No member of the board can direct any member of the police service. Where were the other members of the board? Only Edgar and Irfan Qadir were in attendence. Hardly a quorum.
R.S.O. 1990
Responsibilities of boards
31.
Members of police force under board’s jurisdiction
(2) The members of the police force, whether they were appointed by the board or not, are under the board’s jurisdiction.
Restriction
(3) The board may give orders and directions to the chief of police, but not to other members of the police force, and no individual member of the board shall give orders or directions to any member of the police force.
Idem
(4) The board shall not direct the chief of police with respect to specific operational decisions or with respect to the day-to-day operation of the police force.
So why did the mayor, apparently aware of what was to happen, allow it to go forward without the consent of the rest of the board? The mayor acted without authority and in contravention of the Police Services Act. Either that, or he has absolutely no idea what the Chief of Police is up to and has failed his responsibilities as board chair.
You be the judge.










